Attacking (Or Defending!) Subrogation Claims - Karen Petch
Karen Petch, Barrister, New Chambers
Most practitioners are familiar with the concept of subrogation, most commonly seen when a
guarantor claims the benefit of a secured lender’s security. But on 28 November, a judgment of
Marra Capital Investments Pty Ltd, in the matter of Tri-City Trucks (NSW) Pty Ltd (in liq) v Smith (liquidator)  FCAFC 211 provides a very interesting example of a liquidator
successfully challenging a subrogation, and achieving a very big win for unsecured creditors.
Karen Petch reviews the case and helps you to understand how badly constructed global
settlements might inadvertently damage standing to claim the benefit of subrogation, and what
insolvency appointees should do to confirm that a claim is valid.
Price includes GST
You must be signed in to a Google account in order to access course content
A link to the course content will be emailed to the Google email address you supply
- ALL sales of Traill & Associates Online Courses are final and non-refundable.
- Prices for courses may change at any time and Traill & Associates does not provide price protection or refund in the event of a price reduction or promotional offering.
- If technical problems prevent or unreasonably delay delivery of your product, contact firstname.lastname@example.org for either replacement or refund of the price paid, as determined by Traill & Associates.
- Audio and video products are streamed digitally and there is no delivery of DVDs or CDs. Files are not downloadable. Traill & Associates cannot be responsible for poor internet connections.
- By completing this purchase, you acknowledge that you have thoroughly reviewed the course outline and understand the nature of the program. Delivery of the course can only be made to a valid Google account.
- ANY COPYING, DISTRIBUTING, TRANSMITTING, POSTING, LINKING OR DEEP LINKING WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF TRAILL & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.